X-T5 NIKON AF-S NIKKOR 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR lens 500mm f/5.6 1/500s 250 ISO 0.0 EVįor me, it’s almost always portrait and landscape stuff. It good light is great, with high iso it's a bit noisy but when scaled down to 26 mpxl it really isn't much different then what you get out of the other X cameras. I don't think Lightroom does a very good job with these files (40 mpxl). Guess it depends on what you plan on shooting and your current workflow. They have made serious progress in that time.
I have not shot aps-c for well over 15 years, maybe more, so I feel like I'm starting over. I just know that the raw files at dpreview(on the H2) were just terrible and the S files were excellent with no real artifacts. I am not sure if there is much IQ gain at all. I wanted the H2 for the extra resolution, but it seems like it's not worth the tradeoffs, mainly that super fast AF of the S model. I'm happy to have the 100s for when it's really needed, but was also surprised at how many good Fuji XF lenses there are and how light the H2S was at the store. I sold my GFX 100S before I got the H2, and I regret that, even though the lenses were bigger and more expensive. My Sony cameras almost never did, and my Nikon is barely better. Many cameras struggle with focusing on clouds. I'll keep the H2 for my upcoming storm chase tour, but if the AF upgrade doesn't happen by then, it'll probably get sold. If I need bigger images, software like Topaz Gigapixel does just fine for my purposes, especially when combined with Topaz Photo AI. If I were to only have one, it'd be the X-H2S. I don't shoot much RAW, but from what I've seen, they're both fine, just different. It really needs that expected AF firmware update - I can't get it to even focus on clouds very well at this point. The H2 is my landscape/storm chasing camera alongside the H2S, and it's OK. The X-H2S is my daily driver/work camera, and I do love it. I went to a camera store and all they had was the XT-5(same as H2) and the images were excellent. I'd love to hear from anyone who might have either camera. They are so much better on the S, and it makes no sense. Has anyone been where I am now and if so, which did you choose?ĭownload some of the raws. I really wanted the 40mp, but am starting to think the X-H2s is the only way to go. I downloaded several from the S version and they were far better. They just released the final review yesterday and the raw files are just awful. I was literally set on the the H2(not the S), but after looking at the raw files on dpreview am not so sure.
I'm using a GFX 100s and wanted to add the X-H2 for travelling light sometimes, a bit more speed, lighter lenses and cheaper glass.
0 kommentar(er)
